A thought experiment : What is a hammer that can’t drive nails?

How about a car that can’t roll?

A chair you can’t sit on?

Enough examples, I think. Now, what’s your answer?

Mine? Ok, here goes. A hammer that can’t drive nails IS NOT A HAMMER. A car that doesn’t roll is NOT A CAR. A chair you can’t sit on is NOT A CHAIR.

Each of these cases demonstrates a violation of existential mandate. These theorized objects lack the very feature that most critically defines what they are. Ergo, they are not those things. Plato discussed this too.

So, that’s all theory, you say. So what, right? Well here are some other examples :

What is Popeye’s Chicken & Biscuits if they don’t have Chicken?

What is Burger King without hamburgers?

I think the logic is pretty clear, but just to be explicit, Popeyes CAN’T NOT HAVE CHICKEN. That’s what they DO. It’s what they ARE. Burger King without burgers just isn’t Burger King. It’s part of the NAME. Burger King IS burgers.

I wen’t to BK today and they had no burgers. I’m not sure why the building was even still there. If I ran a law firm, and all the lawyers were gone, I think it’s safe to say my purpose in continuing to run that business would be in serious doubt.

No BURGERS at BURGER KING!

Plato would be disgusted.